What is the intention of this rule??
In the event of a miss-hap, there is to be a switch that cuts the power to the engine and ancillaries to prevent a potential fire or such like??
I imagine the vision was to put a isolation switch into one of the main battery cables to break the circut right??
Why do it that way???
Why not bring it in line with the rest of the motor sport standads in NZ, such as the spec's for circut cars, rally cars, trials trucks etc etc.
They require a kill switch.
The kill switch cuts power to everything, ingnition, fuel pump, ecu, absolutely everything.
The battery circuit remains, i.e main power to starter, main earth to engine block.
The reason I am querying this, is because in vehicle's such as mine, which is a very simple set up, where I have chosen to run dual batteries in parallel, with the engine and the winch running of the them both, a battery isolation switch doesn't really work.
Firstly you need to find a isolation switch capable of handling the current drawn by the winch, 700amp is the max drawn by my Runva from memory. I can't even find one rated to that.
Then there is the extra battery cable required. Obviously we are trying to run the heaviest cable we can get our hands on, so running monster battery cable into the cab, into a place where both driver and co driver can get to it is an issue, let alone finding a spot for the super sized 700Amp isolation switch.
I don't see the point of doing that.
Especially if the intention of the rule is what i suspect it is.
The intention can be met through another method that is far simpler.
If its good enough for all the on road motorsport factions, its certainly good enough for us!!!!!!!!
Infact its even more relevant for us, as it means we don't compromise the principles of good electric winch set up.